Legal Opinion

United States v. Borneman

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided December 23, 1980No. NCM 80 0124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, Judge:

Appellant’s single assigned error attacks the procedure by which his bad-conduct discharge, suspended for 6 months from the date of trial in accordance with his pretrial agreement, was vacated at a time *664he contends was beyond the suspension period in which Naval authorities were empowered to act. The misconduct which prompted the vacation action was unauthorized absence.

Sentence was adjudged on 2 May 1979. Page three of the agreement provides in part that, “If awarded, a Bad Conduct Discharge shall be suspended for a period of six (6) months from the date sentence is adjudged.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. BinghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. RozyckiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. HurdUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. LynchU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API