Legal Opinion

Darr v. Eldridge

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1959No. 6523PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Chief Justice.

This is a suit to cancel a lease on certain premises in Truth or Consequences, New Mexico, on which a mineral water well is located. Hereafter, plaintiffs-appellants will be referred to as lessors, the original lessee as the lessee, and the defendant-appellee as assignee.

The lease from lessors to the predecessor in interest of the assignee was for a primary term of five years with an option to renew for successive five-year periods so long as the covenants set forth in the lease were kept and performed. The lease provided for a minimum royalty of $100 per month for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Wolfe v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Libby v. De BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Owensby v. NesbittNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Taylor v. Kingman Feldspar Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  4. Davis v. Devon Energy Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  5. ConocoPhillips Co. v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API