Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Frayer

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 8, 1960No. 13,599Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFerguson, Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

I concur in part and dissent in part.

At the outset, I note my agreement with the Chief Judge’s conclusion that there was no jurisdiction to try accused for any of the offenses alleged against him except that portion of the adultery specification which stated that the crime *609occurred during his current enlistment and the charge of communication of a threat to Sergeant Caballero. In order that there may be no misunderstanding of my position, I point out that my conclusion concerning lack of jurisdiction is based upon the decision of the United States…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hirshberg v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. NorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. LongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. DellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. HolidayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API