Legal Opinion

People v. Dagampat

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1959No. Crim. 6306PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, P. J.,

In a court trial, Frederick M. Dagampat and Leo Soto Contreras were found guilty of kidnaping and were committed to the Youth Authority. Dagampat appeals from the judgment and the denial of his motion for new trial. Contreras has not appealed.

The evidence consisted of that received at the preliminary hearing and additional evidence introduced at the trial. Stanley Jaramillo, aged 15, was the complaining witness. As Stanley was walking away from a friend’s house near the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Beaudry on the night of December 7, 1957, an open convertible containing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. BroylesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. StephensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. People v. GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. State v. HannaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API