Legal Opinion

Marn v. Fairview Pharmacy Services LLC

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 2008No. A07-1644PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WORKE, Judge.

Relator challenges the decision by the unemployment-law judge (ULJ) that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he had been discharged for misconduct after he contacted one of his employer’s business partners and urged it to terminate a business contract, arguing that (1) he acted reasonably under the circumstances and made a good-faith error in judgment; and (2) his due-process rights were violated because the ULJ relied on hearsay and did not grant him an additional hearing in order to consider an affidavit submitted with his request for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Rehabilitation Specialists, Inc. v. KoeringCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cenveo Corp. v. Southern Graphic Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  2. Becquer v. Mirantis, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
  3. Brian Freed, Relator v. Wholesale Tire & Wheel of MN, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Haddley v. Next Chapter Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  5. Michael Robin, Relator v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API