Legal Opinion
State v. Gundel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 7, 2000No. AC 18475PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CRETELLA, J.
The defendant, John E. Gundel, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his pleas of nolo contendere. Pursuant to Practice Book § 39-27 (3),1 the defendant claims that the sentence ultimately imposed exceeded that which he reasonably believed had been previously accepted by the court as a result of a plea agreement with the state. The defendant further claims that the court improperly denied him an evidentiary hearing.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of this appeal.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- State v. CooperConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. WebbConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. IralaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. WinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.