Legal Opinion

Reddoch v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

379 S.W.2d 641 (1964)

James N. REDDOCH et al.

v.

Eulyse M. SMITH et al.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

May 8, 1964.

Petition to Rehear Denied June 4, 1964.

Charles M. Crump, Memphis, Apperson, Crump, Duzane & Maxwell, Memphis, of counsel, for plaintiffs in error.

Eulyse M. Smith, George L. Rice, Leo Bearman, Robert W. Pharr, Asst. County Atty., Memphis, William H. Williams, County Atty., Memphis, of counsel, for defendants in error.

BURNETT, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves the authority of the Shelby County Board of Adjustment to grant a zoning variation to the defendant in error, Arthur Murray, so as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Ridout v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Reddoch v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Grant v. McCulloughTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Arendale v. RaschTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API