Legal Opinion

Reddoch v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1964PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice BueNett

This appeal involves the authority of the Shelby County Board of Adjustment to grant a zoning variation to the defendant in error, Arthur Murray, so as to permit the erection of a gasoline service station on property situated on the southeast corner of Poplar Avenue at June Road, within the City-County Five-Mile Zone of Shelby County.

The Board of Adjustment granted the application of Murray for re-zoning of the particular property from R-l residential to commercial, in order that the applicant might consummate a contract entered into with the Texaco Company for the erection of a gasoline…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Ridout v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Arendale v. RaschTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sexton v. Anderson County Ex Rel. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  4. Steppach v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
  5. Pack v. Royal-Globe Insurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API