State v. Hessel
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*115DEITS, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions on six counts of murder and two counts of aggravated murder. He assigns error to the trial court’s jury instruction that the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance (EED) does not apply to aggravated murder; to its denial of his motions for acquittal, in which he objected to the prosecution’s failure to present sufficient evidence to corroborate his confessions; to the prosecution’s alleged comments on his failure to testify; and to the court’s failure to merge his murder convictions. We affirm.
In October, 1989, the victim drove to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CrotsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. LerchOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ReamsOregon Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WilleOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BeasonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Walton v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. BurnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.