Legal Opinion

Misener Marine Construction, Inc. v. Norfolk Dredging Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 21, 2010No. 09-10083PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns whether the prevailing party in a dispute arising from a dredging contract is entitled to collect attorneys’ fees. Misener Marine Construction, Inc. subcontracted Norfolk Dredging Company to dredge sections of the Savannah River, a navigable waterway, as part of a larger construction project at the Port of Savannah (the “Port”). After problems at the construction site Misener sued Norfolk, and Norfolk counterclaimed. Norfolk *835prevailed in both Misener’s lawsuit and its counterclaims. Norfolk contends that it is entitled to attorneys’ fees pursuant to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Irina Tesoriero v. Carnival CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Donald Smith v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, LTDCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Diamond Services v. RLB ContractingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  4. J-Way Southern, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  5. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API