Legal Opinion
Clapp v. Miller
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 13, 1923No. 10582PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action for damages commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against E. W. Miller, notary public, and C. W. Miller, his bondsman. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be designated “plaintiff” and “defendants,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
The petition of the plaintiff alleged, in substance, that the acknowledgment and certificate to a certain real estate mortgage made by E. W. Miller as notary public was false and untrue; that the plaintiff, relying upon the genuineness, and validity of said acknowledgment and certificate, purchased said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Slick Oil Co. v. CoffeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Citizens' Bank of Headrick v. Citizens' State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- State Nat. Bank v. MeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Chickasha v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. State Ex Rel. WardMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. AndresCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Black v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Gulf, Colorado & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925