Legal Opinion
Damiano v. Matish
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided October 2, 1986No. G86-458 CA5PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are employees of the State of Michigan in either the Human Services or Administrative Support bargaining units. They are not members of the representative union, defendants International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agriculture Implement Workers of America, UAW, and its Local Union 6000 (“UAW” or “union”). Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent and redress the deprivation under color of state law of rights guaranteed under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiffs allege a violation of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ronnie Watkins v. Simmons and Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Curry v. DempseyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alan P. Damiano (Certified Class Members) v. George G. Matish, International Union, Uaw, and Local 6000, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- George v. Baltimore City Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Association-MEA-NEADistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
- Lutz v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Worker'sDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Murray v. Local 2620, District Council 57, American Federation of State, County, & Municipal EmployeesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000