Legal Opinion

Murray v. Local 2620, District Council 57, American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 17, 2000No. C-99-3668 MHPPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATEL, Chief Judge.

Robert Murray filed a class action complaint on July 30, 1999 against Local 2620 and other defendants alleging violations of his constitutional rights. Murray alleges that Local 2620 has not complied with the requirements for collection of fees from workers who are not members of the union but are benefitted by the union’s collective bargaining agreements. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff alleges violations of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 475 U.S. 292, 106 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westways World Travel, Inc. v. AMR Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  2. Western States Wholesale, Inc. v. Synthetic Industries, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
  3. Lutz v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Worker'sDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  4. Jammeh v. HNN Associates LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  5. Jane Does 1-10 v. University of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API