Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. Shoenberg

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 13, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

92 A.2d 295 (1952)

KAUFMAN

v.

SHOENBERG et al.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

November 13, 1952.

Stanley L. Kaufman (of Kaufman, Imberman & Taylor) and Joshua Peterfreund, New York City, and William Marvel (of Morford, Bennethum, Marvel & Cooch), Wilmington, for plaintiff.

Albert R. Connelly and Edward C. Perkins (of Cravath, Swaine & Moore), New York City, and Caleb S. Layton and Henry M. Canby (of Richards, Layton & Finger), Wilmington, for defendants.

SEITZ, Chancellor.

Plaintiff seeks an attorney's fee for services rendered in connection with the so-called Eleventh cause of action.

I…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corporation v. DannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  2. Bird v. Lida, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
  3. Dann v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965
  4. Mintz v. BohenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API