Legal Opinion

Broadbent v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1971No. 12263Published

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice.

The plaintiff appeals from an adverse summary judgment. As a physician and surgeon he had a policy of insurance with the defendant wherein defendant promised to pay up to $50,000 on each liability claim for which plaintiff might be liable arising out of malpractice, error or mistake in rendering or failing to render professional services.

The policy was issued on or about May 4, 1954, and was effective for two years thereafter. It contained the following material provisions:(2) Upon the Insured becoming aware of any alleged injury covered hereby, written notice shall be given…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Falk v. SUL AMERICA TERRESTRES MARITIMOS, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Anderson v. Beneficial Fire and Casualty CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Dr. John H. Sohm v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Bergh v. Canadian Universal Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Dunn v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API