People v. Stephens
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
In this case we are called upon to reconsider the so-called "misdemeanor cutoff’ rule of People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408, 429; 236 NW2d 473 (1975). After careful consideration, we conclude that the policies behind the Chamblis rule would be better served by a more flexible approach to lesser included offense instructions on misdemeanors. Whenever an adequate request for an appropriate misdemeanor instruction is supported by a rational view of the evidence adduced at trial, the trial judge shall give the requested instruction unless to do so would result in a violation of due process, undue…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- People v. HeftMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. CornellMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. BeachMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- People v BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.