Legal Opinion
Derum v. Saks & Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 26, 2015No. Case No. 14-cv-1921 JM (JLB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING SAKS & COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JEFFREY T. MILLER, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendant Saks & Company’s (“Saks’s”) motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 15), and its related request for judicial notice, (Doc. No. 15-3). The matters were fully briefed and were found suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1.d.l. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies Saks’s motion for summary judgment and its request for judicial notice.
BACKGROUND
In this putative class action, Plaintiff Ilia Derum asserts that Saks violated…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Nunez v. City Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Johnson v. Poway Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Price v. Starbucks Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Novoa v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Mays v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Magadia v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Cabardo v. PatacsilDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.