Legal Opinion

Dahlstrom v. Hurtig

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1940No. 32,490PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff’s cause to recover damages under our death by wrongful act statute, 3 Mason Minn. St. 1940 Snpp. § 9657, met with an adverse verdict. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals. As plaintiff strenuously claims that the verdict lacks evidentiary support, it is essential that the facts should be fully stated.

On July 8, 1938, defendant’s automobile, a new 1938 Plymouth Tudor sedan, Avas being driven by her brother, Arthur Johnson, on a trip from Minneapolis Avith Rochester as their intended des tination. The people riding in the car, in addition to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TownsendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Cosgrove v. McGonagleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Harris v. EggermontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. In Re Estate of ShellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Smith v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Banchs v. Humberto ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API