Consolidated National Bank v. Cunningham
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Superior Judge
(After Stating the Facts as Above). — -There seems, however, to be only two questions involved in this case, the first of which is whether or not there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict and judgment, and second, whether the instruction of the court relative to the measure of damages is sufficient under the circumstances.
Where there is no conflict in the evidence and a verdict inconsistent therewith could not be permitted to stand, the court should, upon motion, direct a verdict. But, if there is any conflict in the evidence upon any material issue, the case…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cook v. Packard Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Southwest Cotton Co. v. ClementsArizona Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- General Petroleum Corp. v. BarkerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Hoff v. LesterWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Collins v. StreitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Steel Motor Service, Inc. v. ZalkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Rickenberg v. Capitol GarageUtah Supreme Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.