Legal Opinion
Linehan v. Berryhill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 27, 2017No. Civil Action No. 17–cv–10433–PBSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaris, C.J.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff David M. Linehan, who suffers from physical and mental impairments, moves to reverse and remand the Commissioner's denial of his application for Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). He claims that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") committed an error of law by ignoring evidence from his treating healthcare providers.
For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion to Affirm (Docket No. 24) and ALLOWS , in *259part, Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse (Docket No. 22).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The following facts are derived from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Seavey v. Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- William Edward Goodermote v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Ward v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeCepeda v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- John F. Boland v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- Perez v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021