Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1977No. 7443PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The questions presented by this case are (1) whether the sale, under economic pressures, of a business employing its own shareholders disqualifies the then unemployed shareholders from receiving unemployment compensation; (2) whether a failure to strictly adhere to the weekly filing requirement pending an appeal from the appeal tribunal bars compensation; and (3) whether the repeal of RSA 282:1-H(4) (d) (Supp. 1972) operates to exclude from annual earnings wages earned by self-employed persons prior to the effective date of the repeal. We hold that the sale of the business was with “good…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  2. Ellsworth v. WatkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
  3. In re the Claim of FontanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. In re Claim of NorrisMedina County Court of Common Pleas · 1972
  5. In re R. S. Smero, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clooney v. ClooneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Appeal of HickeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. Nizza v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Dupuis v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  5. Spaulding & Frost Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API