Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Steinbach

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Docket Nos. 74, 75PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Separate bills by George A. Schmidt against Jacob Steinbach and William P. Schenk to remove clouds upon the title to land. From a decree dismissing the bills, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

These cases were heard and considered together, the evidence applying to both cases, in so far as applicable. The bills of complaint were filed to remove clouds upon the title of the plaintiff in and to the east half of the southeast quarter of section 16, in the township of Bridgewater, Washtenaw county.

It appears undisputed that, in 1876, George Schmidt, the father of the plaintiff, died intestate, owning the above-described premises, constituting his farm, and leaving a widow, a daughter, and his two sons, George A. Schmidt, who is the plaintiff in these cases, and his brother, Henry W.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  2. McKee v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Stevens v. CastelMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Russell v. SweezeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Moore v. Township of KenockeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  2. In Re TomsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  3. Norwood v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Michalski v. United StatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Vandiford v. VandifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API