Legal Opinion

Alcott v. Hyman

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 22, 1962PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

184 A.2d 90 (1962)

Harvey ALCOTT, Rose E. Alcott, Dale Distributing Co., Inc., Morice Haymes, Sidney Suswein and Morton Mainzer, suing individually and as stockholders of P. R. M., Inc., (formerly Associated Artists Productions Corp.) and on behalf of themselves and other stockholders of P. R. M., Inc., (formerly Associated Artists Productions Corp.), similarly situated, and in the right of P. R. M., Inc., (formerly Associated Artists Productions Corp.), Plaintiffs,

v.

Eliot HYMAN, P. R. M., Inc., (formerly Associated Artists Productions Corp.), a corporation of the State of Delaware, United…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  3. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Lebold v. Inland Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1974
  2. Maldonado v. FlynnCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
  3. Crane Co. v. Harsco Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  4. Alcott v. HymanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  5. Marks v. WolfsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API