Legal Opinion

In Re Hubbard

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided November 16, 2005No. 19-30809PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER STRIKING PETITIONS AND ORDERING DEBTORS’ COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COUNSEL SHOULD NOT RETURN FEES AND EXPENSES

MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge.

Each of the above referenced putative debtors has filed a motion seeking an extension of time by which they must obtain the credit counseling required by 11 U.S.C. § 109(h). None of the putative debtors have satisfied the statutory requirements for the requested extension. Because none of the putative debtors were eligible to file bankruptcy as of the date on which their respective bankruptcy petitions were filed, the petitions are stricken.

Backgrou…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Osborne v. Homeside Lending, Inc. (In Re Osborne)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. In Re HubbardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  4. In Re HatzenbuehlerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2002

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re TomcoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
  3. In Re RiosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. In Re ParkerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
  5. In Re SeamanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API