Legal Opinion

American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Benford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1948No. 31936PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The evidence demands the finding that the claimant was struck on the left side of his face and that the lick caused him to jerk his head as a result of which his right eye was injured by his striking it against the guide rail of the machine which he was operating. In the absence of any evidence showing wilfulness or malice on the part of the boy who threw the object, it will be presumed that it was thrown without malice and in a spirit of fun or “horseplay.” There is no evidence that the injured employee participated in the horseplay. This leads us squarely to the question whether an injury…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Leonbruno v. . Champlain Silk MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Georgia Casualty Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Keen v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Fidelity C. Co. of New York v. BardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Baird v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Allsep v. DANIEL CONST. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API