Legal Opinion

Randall v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 25, 2007No. 09-06-198 CRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice.

Earl Floyd Randall, Jr. appeals his conviction and life sentence for capital murder. In eleven points of error, Randall challenges the constitutionality of the mandatory life sentence, challenges the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, challenges the overruling of his motion for new trial based upon ineffective assistance of trial counsel, complains of the admission into evidence of photographs of the corpse, claims the trial court failed to require a unanimous verdict, and claims the trial court erred in its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Leza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. Gokey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2010
  3. Vallado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  4. Daniel James Gray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. Dimas Daniel Gonzalez Zamora v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API