Legal Opinion
Fidelity National Financial Inc. v. Friedman
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided August 19, 2010No. CV-10-0096-CQPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We accepted jurisdiction to answer two questions certified to us by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit:
1) Do collection activities (such as filing for a writ of garnishment or applying for orders from the court to inspect a safety deposit box or require a debtor’s exam) taken within Arizona, renew a judgment previously registered in Arizona?
2) Does the filing of a related lawsuit in a state other than Arizona renew a judgment previously registered in Arizona?
¶ 2 We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6, Section 5(6) of the Arizona…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carrow Co. v. LusbyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Owens v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Lachter v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. BrainArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El DestinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Cable One, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Fidelity National Financial, Inc. v. FriedmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Simon v. Boccarsi (In re Boccarsi)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.