Legal Opinion

Konieczny v. Robert P. Sullivan, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 5, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRuma, J.

In the report before this Division, the defendants claim to be aggrieved by the trial court’s dismissal of their request for a report and draft report.

Judgment was entered for the plaintiffs on October 2,1985. The defendants filed a Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 59 motion for a new trial on October 11, 1985. This motion effectively tolled the time for filing a request for a report and a draft report pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64 (c) (1) (iii):3 The defendants’1 new trial motion was denied without prejudice on January 8, 1986.

On January 13,19864, the defendants filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Locke v. SlaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Canty v. CantyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  3. Gordon v. Pantos Canvas Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  4. Randazzo v. O'BrienMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nonantum Lumber Co. v. JSL Construction Services Management Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API