Legal Opinion

Canty v. Canty

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJodrey, J.

This is a petition to establish a report.

The draft report which is the subject of this petition was disallowed on September 9, 1982 without explanation by the trial justice. See Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64 (c) (5); Marquis v. Galasti, 1982 Mass. App. Div. 218, 218-219. It is unnecessary for us to consider, however, the propriety of the court’s disallowance order as it is clear that the petitioner, John F. Canty, Jr., forfeited all rights to appellate review by failing to comply with the time strictures of Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64.

The docket indicates that on June 11, 1982…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marquis v. GalastiMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Microsonics, Inc. v. Comrex Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Murphy v. Rodman Ford Sales, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981
  4. Whiteman v. DonelsonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. DanielMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  2. Patrick v. OpertMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Konieczny v. Robert P. Sullivan, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987
  4. Nonantum Lumber Co. v. JSL Construction Services Management Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1988
  5. North Shore Protective Patrol & Detective Agency, Inc. v. BaldwinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API