Legal Opinion

Weed Chain Tire Grip Co. v. Cleveland Chain & Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided August 15, 1910No. 7,888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Weed Ciiain Tire Grip Company, Harry D. Weed, and the Parsons Non-Skid Company, Limited, against the Cleveland Chain & Manufacturing Company. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

KILLITS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the application of the complainants for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendant from the manufacture and sale of chain grips for automobiles in infringement upon the patented invention of Harry Parsons under letters patent of the United States of America No. 723,299, and is considered by the court upon the motion papers and affidavits in behalf of complainants and the defendant and the arguments of counsel.

*214By the admission of counsel in argument the court is relieved of the necessity of determining the validity of the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sandusky Foundry & Machine Co. v. De LavaudCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  2. Wheatley v. Rex-Hide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Larkin Automotive Parts Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1926
  4. Elyria Nat. Rubber Heel Co. v. I. T. S. Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
  5. Long v. DickDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API