Legal Opinion
Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Larkin Automotive Parts Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 18, 1926No. 5180PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff sues Montgomery Ward & Co. and the Larkin Automotive Parts Company, alleging infringe-ment, direct or contributory, of the following-patents: Gullborg, No. 1,307,734, claims 1, 2 and 6; Gullborg, No. 1,307,733, claims 3, 4, and 5; and Zerk patent, No. 1,475,980, claims 2, 3, and 5.
The claims in issue under Gullborg, 1,307,734, in previous litigation between the plaintiff and the Larkin Company, were upheld by Judge Hickenlooper in Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. Larkin Automotive Parts Co.;1 the court holding the patent valid against the defense of aggregation,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States Tobacco Sales & Marketing Co. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Ruth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1935
- Larkin Automotive Parts Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
- New Wrinkle, Inc. v. FritzDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1939
- Graham Paper Co. v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.