Legal Opinion

Lay v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1952No. 33843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

1. There was no error in permitting, over the objection of the defendant’s counsel, a State witness, who was one of the officers arresting the defendant, to testify as to the manner and method of operating the form of lottery known as the number game, and that such game was being operated in Athens and Clarke County at the time the defendant was apprehended, other persons having been convicted thereof during the time, including Charlie Williams, the person about whom the witness Hector had testified to the effect that both he and the *317defendant worked with him in the operation of the lottery.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Lunsford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Lumpkin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Ingram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API