Culbertson v. Kieckhefer Container Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stevens, J.(1) The workmen’s compensation act gives the plaintiff no right to compensation from the defendant. The right to claim compensation under this act. is confined to those cases where the relationship of employer and employee exists. That relationship is created only in those cases where the one claiming to be an employee is in the service of another under a contract, either express or implied. Unless there is such relationship, the injured person is left to the remedies given him by the common law before the enactment of the workmen’s compensation act.
The plaintiff was not an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mahowald v. Thompson-Starrett Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- McNamara v. Village of ClintonvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Cermak v. Milwaukee Air Power Pump Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- McNaught v. HinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wagner v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Bunner v. PattiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Dagenhardt v. Special Machine & Engineering, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Papenfus v. Shell Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Langston v. Selden-Breck Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.