Legal Opinion

Washington County v. Querbach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 2015No. A154903; C123186CV; A155453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

This case involves consolidated appeals arising out of a condemnation proceeding and concerns the amount of attorney fees and expenses to which defendant is entitled, in light of a settlement offer by plaintiff, Washington County, that defendant did not accept. The settlement procedure at issue in this case is located at ORS 35.300. Under that statute, a condemner may serve an “offer of compromise” on a defendant at any time after filing a condemnation action, up until 10 days before trial. ORS 35.300(1). If the defendant does not accept the plaintiffs offer — as occurred in this case — the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Nieminen v. PitzerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Rains v. Stayton Builders Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District v. AizawaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Lojy Air Company, Inc. v. Global Financial & Leasing, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API