Legal Opinion

Parker v. Agricultural Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1981PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur E. Blyn, J.

Motion Nos. 99 and 100 of March 13,1981 and No. 132 of February 24, 1981 are consolidated and disposed of as follows.

In this declaratory judgment action, plaintiff moves for summary judgment (pursuant to CPLR 3212 and 3211, subd [c]) declaring that it has the right on account of the existence of a conflict of interest to select and substitute its own counsel in the underlying tort actions, said counsel to be paid for by plaintiff’s insurers. Defendant Agricultural Insurance Co. (Agricultural), plaintiff’s primary insurer, cross-moves for summary judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Village of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Lionel Freedman, Inc. v. Glens Falls InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Utica Mutual Insurance v. CherryNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Nandorf, Inc. v. CNA Insurance CompaniesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. American Home Assurance Co. v. Safway Steel Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Finley v. Home Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Illinois Municipal League Risk Management Ass'n v. SeibertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API