Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Ranney

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 14, 2009No. 08-0596/AFPublished

1Dissent

STUCKY, Judge, with whom BAKER, Judge,

joins (dissenting in part):

I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority’s decision that holds the evidence was not legally sufficient to affirm Appellant’s conviction for disobeying the lawful command of his superior commissioned officer. Article 90, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 890 (2000).

In September 2004, after Appellant was detained for driving while under the influence of alcohol, and, following a base instruction, Security Forces issued him an order restricting his driving privileges. As noted by the majority, the order was a form letter with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LoosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. United States v. ByersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API