Legal Opinion

Veliscescu v. Pauna

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1991No. B050647PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Constantin Velicescu, individually and doing business as Connie Construction Co., attempts to appeal from an order granting defendant Dan Fauna’s motion to vacate a default entered by the clerk of the trial court. Defendant correctly contends that the order was not appealable. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

II. Discussion

A. The Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Vacate a Clerk’s Entry of Default Was Not Appealable

Established California decisional law provides that no appeal lies from an order granting a motion to vacate a default upon which no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Leo v. DunlapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Winter v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Jackson v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Misic v. SegarsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Barker v. Di Lando CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Pryor v. Lyric Avenue Partnership 1 CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Sorensen v. Lam CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API