Legal Opinion
Mill v. State, Department of Health
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 1990No. 87CA0502, 87CA0838PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge SMITH.
The plaintiff, (the Mill) appeals the trial court’s order dismissing its claim in inverse condemnation against the Department of Health (the State). Both parties appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court which awarded the Mill $200,000 as damages for what the court, in essence, determined to be a temporary regulatory “taking.” Both appeals have been consolidated. We reverse the order of the trial court dismissing the Mill’s claim in inverse condemnation and vacate the judgment entered on the Mill’s remaining claims.
The Mill is the owner of a sixty-one acre parcel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of County Commissioners v. FlickingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Abts v. Board of Education of School District Re-1 Valley in Logan CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Board of County Commissioners v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State, Department of Health v. MillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- State, Department of Health v. the MillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Mill v. State, Department of HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Grynberg v. City of NorthglennColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- State, Department of Health v. MillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994