Legal Opinion
State, Department of Health v. Mill
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 19, 1994No. 93SC418PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
This case is a consolidation of two cases. The first was a regulatory taking action initially brought by respondent, The Mill, against petitioner, the Colorado Department of Health (CDH). While that case was pend-tag in the court of appeals, it was consolidated with an appeal by The Mill in an eminent domain action brought by CDH pursuant to the federal Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA), 42 U.S.C. sections 7901 to 7942 (1988), and the corresponding state statute, sections 25-11-301 to -305,11A C.R.S. (1989).
In the regulatory taking action, the court of appeals upheld the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Middleton v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- U S West Communications, Inc. v. City of LongmontSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Greenwood Trust Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Bouton v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
- Colwell v. Mentzer Investments, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.