Legal Opinion
In Re Continental Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided June 30, 1999No. 10-99-066-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING
GRAY, Justice.
Union Pacific Resources has filed a motion for rehearing. In it they assert (1) that we failed to apply controlling law and as a result misplaced the burden of proof, (2) that if we place the burden of proof on Union Pacific Resources, we should allow them to go back to the trial court and present their evidence, (3) that we were mistaken in our belief that no evidence was presented by Union Pacific Resources at the hearing, and (4) that Union Pacific Resources did not engage in gamesmanship because they were relying on the trial court’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- General Tire, Inc. v. KeppleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Ford Motor Co. v. LeggatTexas Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Union Pacific Resources Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Fleming v. Ahumada, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- In Re Frank A. Smith Sales, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- In re Grecon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.