Legal Opinion

Haskell v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 2, 1917No. 7891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Hal C. Thurman, Judge. Action by M. 0. Haskell against the St. Louis & 'San Francisco Railroad Company, W. B. Biddle, and others, receivers, and the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. There was judgment for plaintiff against the last named defendant and ¡for the first-pamied defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HAYSON, C.

This was an action brought in the superior court of Muskogee county, Okla., on February 39, 1915, by M. O. Haskell, against the above-named defendants in error, to recover damages for the loss of household goods shipped over the roads of defendants in error. The record discloses the following facts: On December 23, 1913, plaintiff at Altheimer, Ark., delivered certain household goods to the agent of the St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad Company to be shipped to Muskogee, Okla. The plaintiff paid $1.15 per hundredweight for 925 pounds, and received a waybill as receipt…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ZickafooseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Patterson v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. CakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lusk v. Durant Nursery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API