Legal Opinion

Pabst Brewing Co. v. Melms

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee-county: G-so. E. SutheelaND, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWinslow, J.

The plaintiff brings an action for the partition of real estate, alleging ownership in fee of an undivided one seventh thereof, and a life estate for the life of another in the remaining sis sevenths; also, that each of the six defendants owns an undivided one seventh in fee, subject to such life estate. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and the plaintiff appeals.

The demurrer was rightly sustained. Our statute provides (sec. 3101, Stats. 1898): “ All persons holding lands as joint tenants or tenants in common may have partition thereof by civil action in the manner provided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scoville v. HilliardIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Metcalfe v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Cook v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. Savage v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Morse v. StockmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hershman-Tcherepnin v. TcherepninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Duke v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Lawrence v. DonovanMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. KindschiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Ullrich v. UllrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API