Legal Opinion

Morse v. Stockman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Waukesha County. Tbe following statement of tbe case was prepared by Mr. Justice Cassoday : Tbis bill in equity for partition was commenced December 8, 1884: It alleges, in effect, that John Stockman died intestate, seized in fee simple and possessed of tbe premises .in question’,, leaving Mm surviving a widow, who died half an hour thereafter, and two sons, Gha/rles and Ealph, who were ids only children and sole heirs at law, and who…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Waukesha County. Tbe following statement of tbe case was prepared by Mr. Justice Cassoday : Tbis bill in equity for partition was commenced December 8, 1884: It alleges, in effect, that John Stockman died intestate, seized in fee simple and possessed of tbe premises .in question’,, leaving Mm surviving a widow, who died half an hour thereafter, and two sons, Gha/rles and Ealph, who were ids only children and sole heirs at law, and who thereby became the lawful owners and possessed of the premises in question; that the plaintiff had become the owner in fee and…

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, J.

An application to be made a party is regarded as a special proceeding. Sec. 2594, R. S.; Carney v. Gleissner, 62 Wis. 497. When the application is denied, the *40order to that effect is necessarily final; and if, in addition, it affects a substantial right, it is appealable. Subd. 2, sec. 3069, R. S.; 62 Wis. 491.

It is claimed that since tbe order discontinuing the action as against these appellants was never appealed from, it is still in force, and hence a bar to the application to be made parties. The application for that order was a motion. Sec. 2813, R. S. Being a motion, it could not be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Law v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Forder v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  3. Deery v. McClintockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Brownell v. BrownellNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  5. Burhans v. BurhansNew York Court of Chancery · 1847

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Fischbeck v. MielenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Pabst Brewing Co. v. MelmsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Voelz v. VoelzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Morgan v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API