Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Veach

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1923No. L. A. No. 6947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant Oscar Teach in an action of claim and delivery.

Said defendant purchased an automobile under a conditional contract of sale, binding him to the performance of certain covenants, including payment of a balance of the purchase price in monthly installments. The vendor, upon the execution of the contract, assigned it to the Pacific Finance Corporation (hereafter referred to as the corporation), which later, after its alleged breach, assigned it to the plaintiff, who thereafter commenced the present action in claim and delivery, under which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barlow v. LandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. King v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. National Reserve Co. of America v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hammell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Cohn v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API