Legal Opinion

McGinty v. Bass

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932No. Civil No. 3186PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Georgia May Bass, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Earl McGinty, hereinafter called defendant, under the provisions of chapter 9, Revised Code of 1928 (section 273 et seq.), for the purpose' of establishing the paternity of a child of plaintiff’s which she claimed defendant was the father of. The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, and, after the usual motion for new trial had been overruled, this appeal was taken.

A reporter’s transcript was filed herein, but the same was stricken by this court on motion of plaintiff, and we therefore…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Corey v. HavenerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Harris v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Shaffer v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kehl v. AbramIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Nevills v. ShortridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Gradias v. GradiasArizona Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API