Legal Opinion

Bram v. Dannon Milk Products, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 1970PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order entered August 11, 1969 insofar as it denied the motion of the defendants-appellants for summary judgment made on the eve of trial, unanimously reversed on the law, without costs and without disbursements and the motion granted. The idea submitted by the plaintiff to the defendants, the concept of depicting an infant in a highchair eating and enjoying yogurt, was lacking in novelty and had been utilized by the defendants and their competitors prior to its submission. Lack of novelty in an idea is fatal to any cause of action for its unlawful use. In the circumstances a question of fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Soule v. Bon Ami Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Bernice Stevens v. Continental Can Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  3. Oxenhandler v. Dime Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Helen Davies v. Carnation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hwesu S. Murray v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. And Brandon Tartikoff, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Craig P. Nadel, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Play-By-Play Toys & Novelties, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert HazardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. McGhan v. EbersolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Duffy v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API