Legal Opinion

Helen Davies v. Carnation Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1965No. 19501_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant instituted her suit against a number of defendants, and one of them, Carnation Company, obtained the granting of a motion for summary judgment in its favor. The facts are found in numerous affidavits and other documents offered in support of and in opposition to the motion, as well as in deposition testimony given by the appellant.

A process for manufacturing condensed milk in dry form had been developed by D. D. Peebles, president of Western Condensing Company. An account of his work had appeared in a publication, and Carnation Company had obtained rights to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Irizarry v. President of Harvard CollegeSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. J. Irizarry Y Puente v. President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  4. Joe Boop v. Ford Motor Company, Dearborn Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medallion TV Enterprises, Inc. v. SelecTV of California, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1986
  2. Bram v. Dannon Milk Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Leonard v. Waterloo CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API