Legal Opinion

Oxenhandler v. Dime Savings Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnthony J. Di Gtovanna, J.

This is a motion by defendant for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice. Plaintiff claims that he suggested to defendant bank that it start a 6 ‘ Chanukah Savings Plan ’ ’ which could be made available to its Jewish depositors in the same manner that a Christmas Club had been available to the general public.

Plaintiff first communicated with defendant concerning his idea or suggestion in 1956. Documentary evidence submitted by defendant shows that a Chanukah Savings Plan was in operation in another bank as early as 1948, eight years prior to plaintiff’s first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Fendler v. MoroscoNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert HazardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Ed Graham Productions, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bram v. Dannon Milk Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Official Airlines Schedule Information Service, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. Official Airlines Schedule Information Service, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API