Legal Opinion
Gruber v. Raritan Tp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 9, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
68 N.J. Super. 118 (1961)
172 A.2d 47
JACK GRUBER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE MAYOR AND TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF RARITAN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 9, 1961.
Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair and Warren, attorneys for plaintiffs (Mr. William R. Blair, Jr., appearing).
Messrs. Roberts, Pillsbury and Carton, attorneys for defendants (Mr. Lawrence A. Carton, Jr., appearing).
KNIGHT, J.S.C.
Two separate suits in lieu of prerogative writs were instituted by the plaintiffs, Raritan Associates, a partnership holding legal title to the tract of land in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of DumontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Vogt Ex Rel. Vogt v. Borough of BelmarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Pierro v. BaxendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cloutier v. Epping Water & Sewer CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Stoker v. Town of IrvingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Bd. of Ed. Black Horse Pike v. Tp. of GloucesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Retsky, Oakwood Vil. v. Mun. Ut. Auth., Tp. Marl.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966