Legal Opinion

Retsky, Oakwood Vil. v. Mun. Ut. Auth., Tp. Marl.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 30, 1966Published

1Opinion of the Court

91 N.J. Super. 74 (1966)

219 A.2d 197

HARRY RETSKY AND OAKWOOD VILLAGE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided March 30, 1966.

Mr. Fred Dubowsky for plaintiffs (Messrs. Feinberg & Feinberg, attorneys).

Mr. Vincent C. DeMaio for the defendant.

SIMMILL, J.S.C.

Plaintiffs are the owners of 26.2 acres of land located in Marlboro Township. In December 1963 plaintiffs sought approval from the planning board for the development of 44 lots. Accordingly, they submitted a preliminary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gruber v. Mayor and Tp. Committee of Raritan Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Hilton Acres v. KleinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Magnolia Development Co., Inc. v. ColesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. Jordan v. ZidelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API